Home > News
> Finance Report to the Community
Pacifica Finance Report to the Community
by:
Lonnie Hicks
Chief Financial Officer
July 2003
Introduction
This is a preliminary financial report articulating a financial
vision for the Pacifica Foundation over the next two years.
The goal is to move the Foundation toward a sustainable financial
future. A version of this report has been forwarded to the
Pacifica National Board of Directors.
The quick summary is that despite record increases in revenues
this year, Pacifica has also increased expenses by even higher
levels. While we have substantially reduced legal debt, we
have at each station also increased expenses (salaries, benefits,
and other costs) to the point where next year the annualized
costs will produce little - if any - surplus in the Foundation.
We will, of course, move to prevent this. But, for now this
is how it is looking.
To be specific: The Foundation will end this fiscal with
800k in surplus but next fiscal (FY-04) there will be deficit
of 250 in the worse case scenario or, with our best efforts,
a surplus of approximately 250k- depending upon what we do
to manage costs between now and then. This means financial
management of Foundation resources will be central in the
next several years.
Outline:
The report contains three parts:
Part One looks at a two-year scenario
for Pacifica and identifies ten crucial areas for financial
management and growth.
Part Two describes current agency finances,
budgets and projections of our financial position at the end
of this fiscal year. Additionally I have included the preliminary
budget for fiscal year 2004.
Part Three contains updates to the Board
in a variety of areas, including audit, relocation costs,
staffing etc., and ends with my recommendations for action.
Pacifica’s Finances--Ten Items Which Will
Build our Financial Future
Overview:
While the war in Iraq provided most stations with record-high
revenues, it is clear that most stations will have spent those
funds by January of next year and cash will be in short supply
in the system as a whole.
The reasons are foreseeable. We will have to absorb new expenses
next year ranging from transmitter repair and installation,
new programming, higher costs in health and benefits areas,
higher salaries, the continuing need to retire legal debt,
rehabilitation, deferred repair needs, the need to upgrade
our technologies, and, not the least of all, is the need to
invest in our capacity expand our fund development reach via
the internet.
Funding these needs will require new revenue streams to be
identified and new efficiencies instituted to meet the rising
cost structure of the Foundation. Each station will have to
adopt a financial management strategy to identify monies to
match those increasing costs and to, simultaneously, build
for the future.
For example: While it is clear that the system has the ability
to mount revenue breaking drives this year and last, it also
clear that the forces which have driven that revenue bonanza
have a short life span of probably two years. In this time
poor economic conditions in the United States keep people
mindful of the need to hear alternative voices and alternative
solutions. We have benefited from this.
In this same period the Bush administration will be gearing
up for second term in the White House--mobilizing understandable
resistance to that administration’s policies. Independent
media like us will likely benefit from this as well.
We, therefore, have this unique two-year “window of
opportunity” to move forward to meet this hunger for
alternative views and to build Pacifica to its next level--that
of The Source for Independent Media and to augment our status
as a force for political and cultural change. (For background,
see pacifica.org/news/030208_RebuildingPacifica.html)
Specifically we must:
1) Identify the resources needed to upgrade our signal
capacity and to digitize each signal area where feasible
and possible. Digital is not just new, and indeed might
not even succeed, but it is a “technological place-holder”
we need to pursue to maintain our share of the signal spectrum.
2) We must develop a detailed capital fund to modernize
our plant and facilities, convergent with the above plan.
“Feast and Famine” is not the way to run the
network. A capital fund aimed toward replacing some transmitters,
moving us into better situated areas, perhaps to build or
buy new buildings and own properties rather than rent where
possible. These needs should be bundled system-wide under
a capital fund drive to meet all needs.
3) We must develop an endowment fund to sustain the Foundation
against future years where listener support might flatten
or reduce; where new legal threats might emerge, where rising
costs (salary and health benefits especially) will occur,
where we need to sustain or grow national programming capability.
This means that we must accumulate adequate reserves (say
two million dollars) to allow the system to be secure financially
against future threats and shortfalls. Our future is tied
up with the financial stability that an endowment fund provides.
A two million dollar Foundation reserve will allow us to
return benefits to our listeners (new listener programs)
build an apprenticeship program, fund new web capabilities
but also to ensure that our long-suffering staff people
can be adequately rewarded.
4) Identify new cost reductions and efficiencies at stations
and at the National level. (I have several proposals where
I believe we can save money and increase our ability to
support our listeners as they support us.
5) We must maintain our yearly on-air drives while also
looking to increase our ability to raise funds nationally
and internationally taking advantage of support we are gaining
from our internet listeners including national and international
supporters.
6) We must build a three month cash reserve (3.7 million)
against that rainy day emergency which will surely arise.
Each station’s reserve would be maintained at 10 percent
of total revenue for any given year. This gives our staff
the assurance that should disaster occur we will have the
funds to ensure that they will be paid. The above includes
having set aside one month’s operating costs and salaries
for lean months and cash flow. Needless to say this fund
will also be a hedge against new lawsuits, and other legal
claims which may arise.
7) We must look to our major resource—our National
Board, local boards, and staff members-over the next three
year period. This precious gift should be empowered, not
over used, burned out and taken for granted. Our paid and
unpaid staff must be given individual growth plans and training
to match both those individual needs and those skills required
for the Foundation to grow into the future -confident that
we have good people with high skills to get us there.
8) We must look to our internal structure which needs new
controls against unplanned expenditures which can intervene
at inopportune times when we are not prepared to meet these
unbudgeted expenses. We should not mortgage our future to
present unforeseen needs. The rule of thumb ought to be:
“No expenditure without first identifying the funds
to pay for it; no idea, goal or notion approved without
identifying its financial impacts.”
9) Financial Management skills at the station level should
have high priority. Some stations are well run financially
and have done well with meager resources. Others need more
support at this level. All stations, however, will have
to improve their financial management procedures and skills.
No station is where we need them to be-- all stations will
have to improve because the need for new resources is never-ending
and will be especially more difficult in this a recession
era which seems to have no end. This same point applies,
of course, on the national level and at the national office.
Later in this report I will identify specific steps already
taken in this regard and others being planned.
10) Finally, much of what we will be able to achieve in
the next two years will depend up solidarity, an end to
internal struggles and a period of stability to achieve
vital goals. This can not be overly stressed--Internal Peace
and Stability are needed to move the Foundation forward.
My point isn’t that the Foundation will not survive
over the next two-to-three period—we certainly will
survive. It is that we will have missed the opportunity
to meet the new emerging needs of our listeners and to move
ourselves to a higher functioning level capitalizing on
the hunger we have discovered exists for alternative information
and insight.
BUT HOW TO GET THERE FROM HERE?
The first step is to look at where we currently stand financially
and dream of what it will take to get us into our own future.
Pacifica - Where Do We Stand Now And How Does It
Look For The Future?
On Pacifica’s June 2003 Financial Statement are the
current projections of Revenue and Expense for the Foundation
for this fiscal year. Note that Fiscal Year 2003 is projected
to show a surplus of 811k. (This will likely decease by the
end of the fiscal by about 100k) This represents a 6 percent
savings rate—tantamount to saving 175 dollars per month
on an annualized salary of 35,000 dollars per year.
Also note that this “financial glow” from the
war-inspired revenue “bump” dissipates next fiscal
year. There a deficit looms totaling 244k. This of course,
could be over-come by increasing revenue targets at each station
to last year’s levels. An additional 600k would be realized,
putting the Foundation into the black again by about 356k.
Note, however, these budgets do not include the following
“unbudgeted but vital items” outlined by the Executive
Director in his February report and in subsequent memos:
| 1) No money for digitization of the Network |
|
Estimated cost: 200k |
| 2) No money for a network-wide Apprenticeship program |
|
Estimated Cost: 250k |
| 3) No money for plant, building and facility repairs |
|
Estimated Cost: 650k |
| 4) No money for National Programming and Expansion |
|
Estimated Cost: 450k |
| 5) No money for developing a true Web presence for both
expanded listener ship and fundraising capability |
|
Estimated Cost 125k |
| 6) No money for transmitter upgrades |
|
Estimated Cost: 50k |
| 7) No money in Station and National Reserves |
|
Estimated Cost: 739k |
| |
|
Total 2,464 mil |
But note below how the picture for next
fiscal year is very different. Preliminary budgets show that
system-wide we will experience a small surplus of 87k. This
is can be offset by increasing revenues and by reducing expenses,
but only if we make specific plans to do so. Ultimately both
strategies will not succeed without a restructuring of the
cost structure of the Foundation itself. Simply put, our expenses
are increasing faster that our revenues—this even in
record revenue years. It seems we anticipated those revenue
increases and spent the funds in advance. We must work together
to reverse the trend.
The detail of each station’s finances
projected in this preliminary budget is detailed below.
1) KPFA — The Good News: The station will
enter the fiscal year with reserves of about 200k and has
been extremely supportive of the National Office in the relocation
and in the debt retirement. “A” has contributed
a staggering total of 467k and in support of the effort to
reduce our legal debt and toward relocation! My hat’s
off to KPFA. They could have doubled their reserve amount
this year but contributed those funds to advance the Foundation.
Our deep gratitude goes out KPFA.
The Bad News: Next year KPFA’s reserves
are projected to dwindle to only 34k in additional revenue.
Rehabilitation costs for a space next door to the station
might total over 100k and drive this 34k into negative territory.
This rehabilitation cost is currently an unbudgeted item.
“A” will have to increase its revenue estimates,
perhaps with a summer drive at least 200k. If successful it
will increase its resources.
2) KPFK — in this initial budget, is projecting
surplus in FY04 totaling 232k. However a new union contract
may see that number dwindle. Over-all the station is sound
for the next year but also new costs from the union side will
be annualized next year and that cost is still under negotiation.
3) KPFT — will post a small surplus of
368 this next fiscal. It is a precarious financial situation
where small dollars make a difference in this station where,
comparatively revenues are not as large as those of other
stations. “T” also has some deferred maintenance
which over the course of the fiscal may require unbudgeted
expenditures which will, of course, tip the precarious balance.
4) WBAI projects a small surplus of 55k after
having cut expenses to balance it’s budget. Other financial
controls are also being instituted at the station with management
taking the lead. The upside for “I” is that new
web-related projects can potentially increase revenues for
next year substantially.
5) WPFW — operates on a very small margin
and currently is operating with a 65k cash flow deficit. Next
year is projected with a “breakeven” budget. Unbudgeted
needs include the need for a transmitter upgrade, repair or
replacement. The cost will vary of course from 5k to 25k.
There will be a need to do a special fund-raiser for these
purposes.
6) The National Office has the most severe financial
cash flow deficit in the Foundation for the following reasons:
a. Funds are received in arrears thus the
Central Service payments are a month behind at all times.
This amounts to 223k per year. This is what is meant by
“cash flow” deficit. These monies this year
are being made up for by extensive fund raising.
b. Legal and professional services firm expenses
fall to the National Office to pay. From a high figure of
2.6 million this financial obligation has been reduced to
approximately 700k at this point. The plan is to remove
all legal debt in six months-- a considerable achievement.
However, new obligations are currently occurring and hamstring
the National Office in its attempt to meet expenses. There
is the need to rely heavily upon stations to pay off much,
if not most of this debt, and most stations have been simply
wonderful in responding to this need. Thank you all so much.
c. Past excesses has meant poor credit and
poor credit means that many items cannot be financed and
must be paid for in advance in cash. For example in moving
the National Office to California, moving expenses (8k)
had to be paid for in cash. There are similar examples in
other areas.
d. Moving costs were expensive. Closing out
the Washington office and bringing up the Berkeley office
cost over 225k most of it coming from KPFA. (Thanks especially
to the generosity of KPFA staff ,managers and Board members.
e. The National Office is up and running
currently. But new staff will have to be added in order
to fulfill the Board requirement that the finances of the
Foundation be placed in order. Actual costs for the new
staff will require an additional 20 percent increase in
revenues or about 150k. Our plan is to expand our fund-raising
efforts as we have this year. Next year the National Office
will raise nearly 355k in listener supported funding and
800k over all. This is needed to fill the gap between Central
Services income and actual costs.
f. See below the projected budget as of this
date for FY-04
| |
Pacfica Foundation |
06/22/03 |
|
|
| |
Budget Fiscal Year 2004 |
|
|
|
| |
|
Grand Total |
National
Office |
Total Station-Archives
Budget |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal Year 2003-2004 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
----- |
---------------------------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
| 1.0 |
REVENUE |
|
|
|
| 1.1 |
Listenership |
11,304,909 |
355,000 |
10,679,909 |
| 1.2 |
Major Donations |
532,172 |
50,000 |
482,172 |
| 1.3 |
Matching Corporate |
36,500 |
2,000 |
34,500 |
| 1.4 |
Affiliates-Interest |
149,617 |
0 |
149,617 |
| 1.5 |
List Rental |
15,000 |
15,000 |
0 |
| 1.6 |
Rental Income-Assignment |
24,000 |
0 |
24,000 |
| 1.7 |
Board Donations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 1.8 |
Sales |
165,000 |
0 |
165,000 |
| 1.9 |
Comm. Events |
209,000 |
0 |
209,000 |
| 1.10 |
Crafts-Air |
377,000 |
0 |
377,000 |
| |
Sub-Total Revenue |
12,543,198 |
422,000 |
12,121,539 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2.0 |
GRANTS & CONTRACTS |
|
|
|
| 2.1 |
Grants Income |
184,000 |
7,500 |
176,500 |
| 2.2 |
SCA-Contract Management |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2.3 |
Grants CSG |
1,136,112 |
0 |
1,136,112 |
| 2.4 |
Grants Contract Maint |
300,357 |
300,000 |
0 |
| 2.5 |
SCA-SBU |
76,000 |
74,000 |
2,000 |
| 2.6 |
Gift For Relocation |
25,000 |
0 |
25,000 |
| |
Sub-Total Contracts |
1,721,469 |
381,500 |
1,339,612 |
----- |
---------------------------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
| 3.0 |
GRAND TOTAL REVENUE |
14,264,008 |
803,500 |
13,460,810 |
----- |
---------------------------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 4.0 |
Expenditures |
|
|
|
| 4.1 |
Payroll Costs - Salaries |
5,882,426 |
806,500 |
5,075,925 |
| 4.2 |
Payroll Costs - Fringe Benefits |
1,654,837 |
217,755 |
1,437,082 |
| 4.3 |
Consultants |
224,407 |
143,013 |
81,394 |
| 4.4 |
Administrative |
3,058,009 |
850,000 |
2,208,009 |
| 4.5 |
Programming |
1,563,790 |
708,000 |
855,790 |
| 4.6 |
Development |
1,407,440 |
195,000 |
1,212,440 |
| 4.7 |
Community Events |
154,280 |
0 |
154,280 |
| 4.8 |
Computer Equipment |
14,000 |
0 |
14,000 |
| 4.9 |
Capital Improvements |
42,490 |
0 |
42,490 |
| 4.10 |
Transmitter |
3,700 |
0 |
3,700 |
| 4.11 |
Equipment Reserve |
28,599 |
0 |
28,599 |
| 4.12 |
Mortgage |
79,167 |
0 |
79,167 |
| 4.13 |
Payroll Reserve |
100,000 |
0 |
100,000 |
| 4.14 |
Debt Retirement |
0 |
(249,000) |
249,000 |
----- |
---------------------------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
| 5.0 |
TOTAL EXPENSES |
14,213,145 |
2,671,268 |
11,541,877 |
----- |
---------------------------------- |
------------ |
------------ |
------------ |
| 6.0 |
OPERATING REVENUE |
51,165 |
(1,867,768) |
1,918,933 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 7.0 |
Central Services National @ 17.5% |
|
1,868,984 |
(1,868,984) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Nat'l excess revenue over expenses |
|
(802,284) |
49,949 |
| |
Add'l Nat'l Revenue |
|
803,500 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
51,165 |
(1,216) |
49,949 |
FOUNDATION UPDATES AND FINANCIAL REPORTS
Relocation Update: The National Office has relocated
to Berkeley California.
Currently the staff includes:
a) Ben Garcia, Controller
b) Lynn Magno, Accounts Payable
c) Donna Gates, Payroll Manager
d) Lonnie Hicks, Chief Financial Officer
e) Pilar Gonzales, National Development Director
f) Dan Coughlin, Executive Director
g) Valerie Van Isler, Director of Administration
h) Human Resource Director, (TBA)
i) Assistant Controller, (TBA)
j) Pete Korakis, Web Master
k) Verna Avery-Brown, Washington Bureau Chief
The new Berkeley office is now up and running.
We have the capacity now to pay bills out of that office and
the Washington office will formally close on July 31st.
Foundation Audit
The FY02
Audit is finished. Many are to be thanked for this effort
and needless to say this has not been an easy audit. Here
is a sample of the problems which had to be overcome:
1) Initial data coming from several stations had not been
updated, entered correctly and the like. That meant all
data for several years had to be expunged from the system
and new data created from source documents.
2) The previous administration had poor record-keeping
or documents and certain expenses had no documentation all
at.
3) Legal expenses never ceased. New attorneys called or
made new claims and it was always uncertain which were legitimate
claims and which were not. We, upon my strong recommendation,
needed to settle all outstanding claims and wonderfully
the Litigation Committee of the Board agreed. While this
created a big drain on National and Station resources it
will serve the Foundation much better to have eliminated
this drain not rather that dragging the debt out in the
next three to five years.
Financial Policies and Procedures and
Monthly Reports
Financial Policies
Currently financial policies have been reviewed
by the Board but need to be ratified and approved by the Board
of Directors. I plan to submit these along with the final
budget for next fiscal year.
The need for financial policies at each station
and at the network level is clear. Uncertainty around legitimate
expenditures, unbudgeted expenses, receipts and petty cash
usage is needed. This is an area of high vulnerability for
the Foundation.
The remedies I have thus far instituted include:
1) Site visits by my accounting staff at particular stations
to work with accounting personnel in correcting accounting
procedures and to give support as station personnel try
to enforce correct accounting procedures. The duality between
station managers trying to move the station forward and
accounting personnel trying to hold to the budget is a system-wide
issue. This requires procedures and face-to-face work in
correction.
2) Reviewing each station’s expenditures, cash flow,
petty cash, fund development and revenue projections--instituting
policy where needed and instituting financial controls where
needed.
3) Each of my staff (Controller, Payable Manager, and
Payroll Manager) will work with each Business Manager and
make site visits. Where appropriate and where necessary
I am prepared to position staff at a given station to control
costs directly if station managers are unable to do so.
It is that important to us.
Huge costs can occur at a given station in a very short
period of time. Often station personnel do not want to make
the necessary changes needed to correct the finances of
a given station.
4) Development of the “paperless” network.
Currently we have developed the capacity to scan all documents
to a web site which is located on our Berkeley office server.
This means that accounting personnel (and others with appropriate
security) can view current and archive documents (financial,
Board documents, vendor documents) directly from anywhere
in the world. This is part of the goal of transparency.
We are testing scanning machines at the National and at
KPFA before rolling out to the stations.
Monthly/Quarterly Reports
The quarterly financial report for the nine
months ending June 30th has been posted on the web. Figures
for stations will be estimates from budget because several
stations are behind in their positing of their monthly expenses.
No station at Pacifica does a close at the end of each month.
This will be a goal for next fiscal. Each business manager
will be given training toward that goal. It is necessary to
ensure good financial numbers. (We will train each business
manager in this area.)
Additionally, each must focus on financial management
given that revenue and resources will be flat or reduced next
fiscal year. “Ramping up” due to increased revenues
is almost always accompanied by the need to “ramp down”
due to shrinking revenues. Witness the state governments and
what happened to the Federal government. We are, as a media
organiation, subject to those same economic forces.
What to Do and What is to be Recommended?
Goal #1
All goals, ideas and programs must be presented, or explored
with an accompanying budget or financial impact statement.
This would be true at the Station, Board and National levels.
This is prudent financial management.
Goals #2
Any program, idea or project must be given a priority, justify
itself on some agreed upon basis such as “it is revenue
generating” “it is a Board priority,”
it is part of some given approved budget or expenditure.”
Goal #3
We need to increase the Fund Development capacity at each
station aiming toward specific financial goals and targets.
Goal #4
We need to identify crucial goals, (Digitization, the Apprenticeship
Program, National Programming, a Capital Campaign) as unbudgeted
items and build fund-raising campaigns around them.
Goal #5
The Board should take upon itself the goal of managing its
costs. Again I would point out that conference calls last
month totaled 8k and we don’t as yet know the future
costs of the By-Law.
Goal #6
Finally, the National and the Stations must institute additional
financial management procedures aimed toward reducing costs.
This, in a shrinking revenue scenario, is the only alternative.
Summary
The Foundation will, over the next several
years, experience less revenue, more expenses and greater
demands upon resources. In this kind of situation financial
management of current resources is essential.
The Foundation will experience increasing pressure
for more programming, much of it costly and increased pressure
from newly-enfranchised listeners who most certainly want
to see at least some programming changes at some stations.
My goals for the Network: Management our resources such that
surpluses are on hand to weather the storms and to seize the
opportunities which exist over the next two years.
|