visit the Pacifica Radio Archives

 

Home > Programs > Pacifica Reports From Iraq > Mon., Feb. 23, 2004

Pacifica Reports From Iraq
Human Rights Activist Ahmet Faruk Unsal


listen to this interview
downloaddownload this interview
(.mp3)
Ahmet Faruk Unsal is a member of the Turkish Parliament from the ruling Islamic AK (Justice and Development Parti). A driving force behind the Turkish Parliament historic refusal last year to allow George Bush to launch a second front on Iraq from Turkish soil, Unsal is also a human rights activist and a board member of Amnesty International. We spoke to him at his office in the capital Ankara.

Unsal: I really don't guess what will happen next in Iraq because Kurdish government -- or the Kurdish administration maybe - couldn't find enough support to make their own political programs because there is resistance from regional countries. For example Iran, Turkey, and also Syria is also resisting to their federal solution, you know. I'm not a Turkish Nationalist. I'm looking at these kind of subjects first of all in a realistic and humanistic way. Federation on an ethnic basis as we say in Yugoslavia experience. Its not realistic. Its not easy to manage because when you base a political structure on an ethnic stages there cannot be passing from one ethnicity to another it will be impossible, you know. So if you make an ethnic structure this will make --

Pacifica: It will keep people separated--

Unsal: But of course I am anxious about future armed conflicts so rather than an ethnic federation I prefer a democratic Iraq, which will respect the cultural properties of each group.

Pacifica: This may be something new for people in the United States. People often compare Iraq to Palestine with the suicide bombings, but people do not often compare Iraq to Yugoslavia in America so its an interesting comparison that you make.

Unsal: Yes I know but this is my idea, and I know that if you put put a block between peoples then afterwards when you build an ethnic structure on this conflict it will not help bring peace for our future so when we look back at the history of the world we can see this and we must urge them not to make an ethnic separated political bodies so I think Turkey's choice is right.

Pacifica: But what power does Turkey have in this situation? I was very interested too see that when Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan was in South Korea he was encouraging South Korea to send troops to Kirkuk because Turkish troops can't go.

Unsal: Yeah Kirkuk is the most problematic city in Northern Iraq. There is not one ethnic group that has a majority. Approximately all the ethnic groups are equal in populations. In the past Saddam was trying to change the balance for Arabs. He was encouraging Arab populations to settle in Kirkuk and he changed the nature of the ethnic view of Kirkuk. Now Kurds are there. This is really tragic-comic. It will create tension between brothers, you know, Arabs, Kurds, Turkomens, and Assyrians because their numbers are very equal.

Pacifica: But what it looks like what this is leading to -- because as you say it will be very difficult to make a federal Iraq along ethnic lines -- is you see more and more the possibility of Kurdistan emerging. Do you think it would be bad if Barzani and Talabani decided to give up on Iraq and form a country called Kurdistan?

Unsal: It is not realistic. I do not want to say that they do not have a right to make their own decisions, but being realistic I see that when those kinds of political structures will happen there will be really complicated problems -- wars maybe -- and I don't want any more blood because of such problems. We can solve our problems without armed conflicts and the way to solve this problem without this problem is democratic Iraq. Why not urge us to set up a democratic Iraq. Its not realistic (to set up Kurdistan). It's not humanistic.

Pacifica: Do you think the situation would be better or worse if there were 10,000 Turkish troops in Iraq. If they had to be able to go--

Unsal: I think it would be very, very bad for Turkey. Not only for Turkey. For Iraq for Kurds for Turkomens for Arabs. I think Turkey should never send its troops to conflict regions.

Pacifica: Why? Because most people in this Parliament building think its about strategic interest.

Unsal: But then I want to ask those people why they didn't send troops if its so strategic. Everybody sees the danger not only in Turkey but in the region so nobody has the courage to send Turkish troops to this region. Everybody sees it. So its really a difficult decision.

Pacifica: What's the most important thing you think I should know?

Unsal: I think the most important thing is that if you construct a political system on an ethnic basis it will be the end of Iraq. As a Muslim, as a human, as a member of Parliament, and as a child of this region I see the end of Iraq will be the beginning of a very bloody process. I think democratic elections including all groups there is a good compromise.

 

nbsp;

 

Support the Pacifica Foundation

 

 
General Links:
Pacifica.org Home | Privacy Policy | Fundraising Code of Ethics | Support Us |
Pacifica Programming Links:
Pacifica Programs | Our Sister Stations | Our Affiliates | Pacifica Radio Archives |
About Pacifica Links:
About Us | News | Governance | Elections | Financial Information | Contact Us |
Pacifica Community Links:
Pacifica Forums | Image Gallery | Community Events Calendar |

listen to KPFA listen to KPFK listen to KPFT listen to WBAI listen to WPFW